World War III (™): The Pentagon is arming the world


What could possibly go wrong? The US is only arming ‘allies’ of course.

And only arming them with advanced weapons systems.

It is not like today’s allies could be tomorrow’s enemy.

It is not like the top four or five defense contractors in the world should be deprived of making even more profits. The shareholders have miles of bunker tunnels to build before the sleep. That costs money. 

It is not like US taxpayers are weary of paying for weapons that might someday be used against them. 

It is not like the Pentagon and the military industry would relish an all-out Hollywood-style war with their former allies. More war – more armaments sales! 

And yet they call North Korea’s leader insane. And Iran a rogue state.

And yet the biggest issue discussed below is not whether or not to arm the entire freaking world, but the need to increase the speed in which new contracts can be approved! 

James Porteous

23 May 2018 | Patrick Tucker  | Defense One

TAMPA, Florida — The Pentagon is speeding up U.S. weapons deliveries to allied militaries such as Saudi Arabia, Romania, Japan, and South Korea through new “pilot authorities” that change how it can design and execute contracts.

“We have a whole variety of specific programs where we are focused on applying these authorities: Patriot Missiles for Romania; Global Hawk for Japan, THAAD [high-altitude air defense missiles] for Saudi Arabia, and TOW [vehicle-launched missiles] for multiple foreign military sales partners,” Ellen Lord, defense undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment, said Wednesday.

These new authorities will allow the Pentagon to shave “years” off the time it takes to deliver weapons to friendly militaries, Lord said at the annual SOFIC event here.

“The idea here is that we often have the same system that is being sold to multiple countries, or perhaps a small variant,” she said. “If we have just gone through certified cost in pricing and gone through all the [Defense Contracting Management Agency] and [Defense Cooperation in Armaments] work,  and we have current information, we can take that and leverage that to quickly go and sell to another country. That’s the basic idea. Then we’ll always follow up and verify, and so forth.”

Saudi Arabia is a frequent target of missile strikes by Houthi rebels. Regional authorities routinely fret about Iran’s growing missile capabilities.

Lord said there was no shortage of countries looking to do business with U.S. arms dealers so long as the government can move faster to approve the deals. Asked about Ukraine, which recently received U.S. anti-tank weapons it had been seeking since 2015, she forecast faster sales.

“We have quite a focus on Ukraine. I’ve been talking with policy [officials] just over the last week about trying to find an individual who can work directly with Ukraine to help them with their acquisition process on an intermittent basis,” she said.

The pilot authorities were created by the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act. Among other things, they allow the Pentagon to write domestic arms contracts that make provisions for export sales, Lord said.

This means that “when we have an international partner that wants to buy a U.S. system, we don’t need to spend weeks and months writing another,” she said. “We have a system where we can fill in the blank with the country, the price, and any unique requirements.”

Lord also said the Pentagon would work with “the engineering community” to make sure that future weapons are designed with an eye toward exportability — reducing, for example, the number of parts whose sensitivity might hinder their sales abroad.

Lord formerly worked for Textron, whose executives often complain that their Shadow UAV is forbidden to compete on the international market with a similar Chinese drone that has found clients in the Middle East. She struck a similar note today, recounting conversations with “partners and allies who wanted U.S. technology, but eventually bought elsewhere.

“I would hear stories: ‘We’re going to go with the Russian alternative. We’re going to go with the Chinese alternative because we know we can get it quickly. We know it might fail 80 or 90 percent of the time, but we will have something to work with.’ That’s a missed opportunity for the U.S. We’re going to make sure we do everything possible to improve on that,” she said


Original Link:  Pentagon Is Speeding Up Arms Exports to Saudi Arabia, Other Allies

Read This Day from Hawkins Bay Dispatch

One comment

  1. Ukraine does not need weapons, it is for peace with its neighbors, all disputes must be resolved through dialogue, there are no enemies in Ukraine, the Donbas is part of Ukraine that is against violence and fascism.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s